Despite the announced cessation of hostilities, Israeli forces continue to operate in Lebanese territory—raising questions about the truce’s durability and regional security.
Lebanese army members gesture as they drive through a damaged site at the Lebanese village of Khiam, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025 [Karamallah Daher/Reuters]
Key Developments:
Ceasefire Terms vs. Reality: While the agreement halted cross-border rocket fire, it contained no explicit timeline for Israeli withdrawal. Military analysts note this mirrors past “quiet-for-quiet” understandings that collapsed due to similar ambiguities.
Israel’s Security Rationale: The IDF cites “ongoing threat mitigation,” claiming Hezbollah has relocated rockets near civilian areas in violation of UN Resolution 1701. Satellite imagery reviewed by [Your Outlet] shows renewed earthworks at suspected Hezbollah sites.
Lebanon’s Outrage: Prime Minister Najib Mikati condemned the occupation as “a blatant violation of sovereignty,” while Hezbollah officials warn of “resistance operations” if troops remain.
On the Ground:
Villagers in border towns like Aita al-Shaab report daily patrols by Israeli drones and armored vehicles. “The bombs stopped, but the fear hasn’t,” said local teacher Rima Hassan. UN peacekeepers (UNIFIL) confirm monitoring “restricted movements” but lack enforcement power.
Global Reactions:
US: Urged “maximum restraint” but avoided direct criticism of Israel.
Iran: Accused Israel of “fueling the next war” during a Security Council session.
What’s Next?
With indirect talks stalled, observers fear miscalculations could reignite conflict. As former Lebanese diplomat Karim Emile Bitar noted: “A ceasefire without political resolution is just a timeout.”